The Post-Liberal Future?

After all these years, is the WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democrat-voting) worldview held by the media, the entertainment industry, and the academy (at minimum, and completely ignoring government) about to come crashing down on the rocky shoals of reality?

Maybe.

While the above link was written from a British point-of-view (which I have quasi-Americanized for this post), alterations to the WEIRD worldview (also known as the secular liberal baby boomer worldview) won’t be driven by the mere debt-driven collapse of the welfare-state which has produced… other problems:

The problem for the left has not so much been “rights without responsibilities” as rights without the relationships that help sustain them.

Problems? What problems? And relationships? Really?

Consider this as background:

Most traditional societies are “sociocentric,” meaning they place the needs of groups and institutions first. Today most rich societies are “individualistic,” making society a servant of the individual.

In other words, we’re seeking personal peace and affluence, as Francis Schaeffer—and Boston—told us.

So what is post-liberalism, and is it a solution?

Post-liberalism… [is] to consider where the social glue comes from in a fragmented society. To that end, it acknowledges authority and the sacred as well as suffering and injustice. It recognises the virtues of particular loyalties—including nations—rather than viewing them as prejudices. And it seeks to apply these ideas to the economic as well as the social sphere.

Post-liberalism sounds like traditional liberalism—that is, Christian liberalism—as opposed to the liberalism of today.

Back to the future or déjà vu… again? Not so fast.

Much of this goes against the grain of an increasingly WEIRD and legalistic politics…

One of the many lessons in the WEIRD worldview is that far easier to campaign, preach, proclaim, and pose than it is to govern. Although I make such an observation with President Obama specifically in mind, it can apply to almost any candidate.

Life tends to favor those who do well versus those who wish us well… or worse, those who decree we will be well.

Broccoli, anyone? It’s good for you…

Advertisements

About Professor Mockumental

I enjoy almost all forms of parody, buffoonery, and general high-jinks. Satire has shown itself to be an essential societal need; I therefore humbly offer my services in such a manner. I enjoy mocking the usual suspects at the New York Times (Charles Blows, Moron Dowd, and the earth is flat guy) and Washington Post (Dana Milkbag, E.D. Dijon, and David Ignoramus). There are many others as well, but sadly, there are always too many targets and too little time.

Posted on March 30, 2012, in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: