Darwinism and Economic Darwinism

Darwinism offers that random mutations end up driving adaptations that offer survival benefits; survival of the fittest and all that. Secularists, especially lefty secularists, favor Darwinism.

Economic Darwinism offers that peoples (and by extension, nations) must compete economically or regress, but many secularists, especially lefty secularists, don’t favor Economic Darwinism. Instead, they  trot out the “social contract” or the President’s “you didn’t build that” argument. Both the social contract and the “you didn’t build that” arguments believe beneficial economic mutations—which are created and driven by our “elites”—will instead offer social survival benefits that are superior to individuals with the freedoms to decide such issues themselves.

As it is, our elites have now burdened us with a sort of Economic Anti-Darwinism where the un-freedom of the welfare state requires the productive support the unproductive. Economic Anti-Darwinism also manages to stick future generations with the bill. It’s kind of like a multi-generational and government-endorsed form of dine and dash (and is generally given a benign sounding Orwellian name).

The disincentives of the anti-freedom and anti-achievement philosophies should be readily apparent in that they bestow power on those who are in a position to “spread the wealth around.” This suggests suggest the only real benefits from the left’s self-invented social contract and “you didn’t build that” arguments are to those in power, that is our “elites.”

Power may corrupt, but ineptness with power is especially dangerous (that assertion is a minor derivation on the whole idiot with initiative thing).

As voters, we can either act to remove the power of our elites—think term limits—or to remove their overreach and ineptness (which is even more problematic).


About Professor Mockumental

I enjoy almost all forms of parody, buffoonery, and general high-jinks. Satire has shown itself to be an essential societal need; I therefore humbly offer my services in such a manner. I enjoy mocking the usual suspects at the New York Times (Charles Blows, Moron Dowd, and the earth is flat guy) and Washington Post (Dana Milkbag, E.D. Dijon, and David Ignoramus). There are many others as well, but sadly, there are always too many targets and too little time.

Posted on July 19, 2012, in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: