The MSM and the sexuality protected classes
The left and their handmaidens in the media tell us that homosexuality, transgenderedness, bisexuality, etc., is normal, healthy, and good.
They tell us that ideas regarding the limits of human sexuality are vestigial constructs of society’s repressive patriarchy. After all, L.G.B.T.Q.I.A. people were born this way; they can’t help it. (In the same way, liberals assert guns cause people to kill one another and yet if a Prius is picked in lieu of a Chevy Volt, it is bafflingly regarded as a personal choice.)
Are there constraints to the goodness of sexuality as an anything-goes way-ahead? Yes: Jerry Sandusky and the Elmo puppet guy. But what about intergenerational sexual relations?
But if sexuality is an artificial construct of our repressive Puritan roots (and if there is no real or enduring truth, only things and ideas made by
man humanity and unguided natural processes), what are the limits of sexuality? Why not polygamy, pedophilia, bestiality, harems, or incest?
Could it be that the age of consent is an artificial construct? After all, if sex between consenting 16-year olds is condoned, why not between a 30-year old teacher and a 16-year old?
The benefits of non-heteronormative sexual relations were advanced in the 1970s but to date (and largely due to the enduring image of Helen Thomas, pictured above), the idea—explicably and thankfully—has gained little traction.